How to Use Crucial Conversation’s STATE Method to Resolve Conflict

How to Use Crucial Conversations State Method to Resolve Conflict

Dealing with conflict can be tough.

Emotions are strong, words are said that shouldn’t have been said, and often everyone leaves feeling worse than when they started.

It doesn’t have to be that way.

You don’t have to resort to silence or violence.

Kerry Patterson, Joseph Grenny, Ron McMillan, and Al Switzler in Crucial Conversations give us a method to deal with conflict effectively.

It’s called the STATE method.

STATE is an acronym and stands for:

      • S – Share your facts
      • T – Tell your story
      • A – Ask for the other’s paths
      • T – Talk Tentatively
      • E – Encourage Testing

However, before we get into each letter, we need to review a couple of other principles from the book first.

Why’s that?

Because the STATE method builds off these principles. Without them, you won’t be able to use this method to its full potential.

We’ll discuss the few principles briefly and then go into the STATE method.

Let’s begin.

For a deeper dive into conflict resolution, check out these articles:

The Pool of Meaning

When disagreements happen, it often turns into a “who’s right” battle instead of learning the other person’s perspective and resolving the issue.

That is not helpful. Instead, our goal should be to hear everyone’s perspective and let them contribute to the “pool of meaning”.


Because each person has different feelings, opinions, viewpoints, and understanding of the situation. By combining it all together and getting all the information, we can make better decisions.

And by understanding other people’s viewpoints better, we can better assess the situation we are discussing to be able to better resolve the issue.

The Path to Action

The path to action goes like this:

Crucial Conversations State Method Path to Action

First, something happens. We see and/or hear it.

Second, we tell a story about it.

Third, we feel an emotion based on that story.

Fourth, we act on that emotion.

Let’s give an example:

You are driving down the road and someone cuts in front of you. You get angry and yell at the person.

What happened?

Someone pulled in front of you. Those are the facts. That’s all you know.

What happened next? You told a story about that person. You may have told the story (assumed) that that person was selfish, rude, a jerk, etc.

And you responded (with anger) based on that story.

Tell a different story

What if you told a different story? What if your assumption about that person was that the person was trying to get to the hospital because his or her child was injured in a wreck?

Would you have had the same reaction then?

You see, we tell a story when something happens, and our emotions are based on that story, even if we don’t realize we told a story.

By controlling your story, you can control your emotions. That’s one reason the “State Your Facts” part is first in the STATE method. You deal with the facts first.

Start with you

Before you start a conversation with someone else, you need to deal with yourself first.

The only person you can control is you. If you go into the conversation with the wrong motives, you are going to get a bad result.

Before you go in, and if you catch yourself moving toward silence or violence (verbally attacking, demeaning, getting louder to control the conversation, etc.), ask:

“What do I really want from this situation/conversation for myself/the relationship/the other person?”

You may be ticked off, but if your motive is for a good relationship, go into the conversation with that motive and keep reminding yourself of your motive.

And remember, in most situations, you have contributed to the problem somehow, even if it’s by you not standing up and saying something sooner.

Look to see what contribution you had to the issue.

Make it safe

Patterson and the others said that you can say anything to someone if the other person feels safe.

Often conversations dealing with conflict go wrong because the other person feels unsafe. They may feel the person is trying to control them, has ulterior motives, and so on. So they get defensive.

To help combat that, you can:

Find a mutual purpose

What is a mutual purpose that everyone can move toward? Do you both want a better relationship? Do you want good working relationships? Do you want the project to turn out well?

Find a mutual purpose, some agreement, to build off.


If you have done something wrong to the other person or have offended them, apologize, and be sincere.

Apologizing can go a long way in making the other person feel safe.


When you contrast, you say what you don’t mean then say what you do.

This helps the other person know what your intentions are. For example, if you are discussing a report someone has spent time putting together, you might say:

“I know you have put a lot of work into this report. I’m not saying that you’ve done a bad job or that you’ve been sloppy in it. What I’m saying is that I’m concerned about how the stats…”

Or in a relationship situation:

“The last thing I want to do is give the impression that I am unhappy with the way you clean up after yourself. You do an amazing job.  I just think that if we buy some new organizational bins, it might make it easier…”

“Recognize the Purpose Behind the Strategy”

Sometimes we will argue over strategies and not realize that we all have the same purpose.

You and your spouse or significant other may be arguing about where to go for the evening. You both have the same purpose – you want to spend time with each other. Your strategies are just different.

If you take the time to find why each person wants that particular strategy – to go to that particular place or do that particular activity – then you can much easier work out a solution that is agreeable to both.

The STATE method

Okay, we’ve gotten those principles out of the way. Now let’s focus on how to do the STATE method and how to incorporate these principles into it.

The first three letters are “what to do” and the last two are “how to do it”.

S – Share your facts

When you start the conversation, state the facts first, not your story.

Remember the path to action?

Crucial Conversations State Method Path to Action

First, something happens, and you see and/or hear it. Then you tell a story based on those facts.

The story isn’t facts. The story is an assumption. If you start off in your conversation telling the person your story (your assumptions), there’s a good chance you will never get to the facts.

Facts are the least controversial. They are the details that happened. It’s hard to argue facts (though there may be parts of the facts you are missing).

If someone is constantly late, don’t say or infer that they are lazy or unreliable. Just discuss the fact that they have been late this past week by 20 minutes every day.

T – Tell your story

This is where you share the story, the assumptions, you made based on the facts.

As we’ll discuss in the other “T”, when you share it, share the story as an assumption, not as a fact. You don’t know if that’s true – it just seems that way to you.

When they get defensive

Though the other person could possibly get defensive with the facts, the chance that they will get defensive with your story is more likely. When/if that happens, remember the steps to make it safe:

      • Find a mutual purpose – find what you both agree on.
        Example: You both want a better relationship and better communication.
      • Contrast – say what you don’t mean, and what you do.
        Example: “I didn’t mean to diminish your contribution. You’ve put in a lot of work. What I’m trying to say….”
      • “Recognize the purpose behind the strategy” – why do each of you want what you want?
        Example: If everyone wants the car for the night, what they need is a way to get from point A to point B. The argument isn’t about the car, it’s about a way to get there.

Also, when the other person gets defensive, your response might be to “fight” back. If you feel yourself going silent or violent, remember your reason and what you want out of this conversation and relationship.

Back to telling the story itself

With the person who is late, you might say:

“When you are constantly late, it gives me the impression that you are unreliable and don’t care about how your lateness affects everyone else. Am I missing something about what’s going on?”

With a boss who seems to check on you a lot:

“Lately you’ve asked me to send every draft to you and check up with you every day about the project. I get the impression that you may not trust me or my work. Is that the case or am I misunderstanding something?”

A – Ask for the other’s paths

After you share the facts and tell your story, ask them to do the same.

Remember the pool of meaning?

The point of the conversation is not to prove that you are right but to understand each person’s perspective and resolve the situation (even if it means setting boundaries with the other person).

If you go into the conversation telling the other person they are wrong and don’t listen to their perspective, it’s not going to turn out well.

Ask the other person their perspective and listen. Ask questions and dig deeper. Don’t interrupt or argue.

You could say something like:

      • “What are your thoughts?”
      • “How do you see it?”
      • “What’s your perspective?”
      • “Do you see it differently?”
      • “What’s going on?”
      • “That’s how it appeared to me. Am I wrong somehow?”

T – Talk Tentatively

When you are sharing your story, remember that it’s an assumption, not a fact.

Therefore, don’t share it as a fact. Share it tentatively, as a possibility, not as a certainty. You may find out that your assumptions are completely wrong.

According to Merriam-Webster, tentative means:

“Not fully worked out or developed” and “hesitant, uncertain”

You may have noticed in the examples above that for each story, it was presented as an opinion and how someone saw it, not as a fact.

With the sample questions to get the other person to talk, each was giving the possibility that you were wrong.

Saying something like “It’s obvious to me” or “Anyone would draw the conclusion that..” “You did this because you meant to..” will only hurt you in resolving the issue.

Instead, when you tell your story, say something like:

      • “It seems to me that…”
      • “In my opinion…”
      • “it makes me wonder if…”
      • “From my viewpoint..”
      • “I get the impression that…”

Also, tentative does not mean wimpy.

Don’t say things like:

      • “It’s probably not true, but…”
      • “Call me crazy, but…”
      • “This is probably stupid…”

Your concern is important. Don’t treat it like it’s not.

E – Encourage Testing

When you ask the other person to speak, you want to encourage the other person to share their viewpoint, even if it is completely opposite.

When you ask them to share, make sure they understand that you want to hear what they have to say no matter how controversial or opposing it is to what you said. And mean it.

If someone is reluctant to speak up, you may have to try some other techniques (note: some may apply in some situations more than others).

Play devil’s advocate

You may have to play devil’s advocate against yourself.

“Let’s say I’m wrong. What if the opposite is true?”

Continuous encouragement

You may have to keep asking them to test your statements. Keep encouraging them to give you different viewpoints.


Patterson and the others give another acronym to help get others to talk: AMPP.

A– Ask to Get Things Rolling

M – Mirror to Confirm Feelings

P – Paraphrase to Acknowledge the Story

P – Prime When You’re Getting Nowhere

Crucial Conversations State - AMPP Method

A  – Ask to get things rolling

Ask the other person to speak up. You can use the questions we mentioned in the Ask section earlier.

M – Mirror to confirm feelings

When you mirror, you reflect back to the person their feelings. Sometimes people will say they are okay, but their tone and body language say otherwise.

      • “You seem upset to me.”
      • “You seem frustrated.”
      • “You say you are fine, but by the tone of your voice, you seem frustrated.”

P – Paraphrase to acknowledge the story

When you paraphrase, you take what the person said and put it in your own words. It acknowledges to the other person that you were listening and gives the other person a chance to correct you if you misunderstood.

      • “So what you are saying is…”
      • “Let me see if I got this right. You’re upset because…”

P – Prime when you’re getting nowhere

Sometimes the other person will not open up. You may need to “prime” the other person to get them to talk.

To prime, you guess what the other person might be saying. This is more of a last resort.

      • “Are you thinking that the reason I did this is to show off?”
      • “Do you feel like I’m not considering your viewpoints when I make my decisions?”

Remember the point is to encourage them to share their viewpoint so that you can understand the situation better and resolve the issue.

What happens if we disagree?

Now, Patterson and the others gave this next tool for more of a context where someone shares a concern (or you get them to share it using one of the AMMP or prime methods), but it can also be a good tool for our situation as well.

This is the ABC method:

A – Agree

B – Build

C – Compare

ABC Method

A – Agree

First, when someone presents an issue or viewpoint that you disagree with, find where you agree.

“I agree, this whole process has been tough. You have put in a lot of hours”.

B – Build

Then you build on it on something they may have missed or didn’t know.

“I’ve also noticed that the whole department has been chaotic the past week…”

C – Compare

Then you compare the differences between your viewpoints. You don’t say that one person is wrong and that you are right, you show the difference.

“From my perspective, you feel that it’s been chaotic because of the changes in the structure. From my viewpoint, it’s because the department doesn’t want to report to the new manager.”

Coming to a solution

Remember, as you go through the process, focus on the reason you are having the conversation, your motive, and on mutual purpose. Think about the consequences of not having it or doing it poorly.

Once each person has shared their viewpoints and discussed the issue, you then can begin to discuss the next steps.

Depending on the setting, you may work on it in different ways.

You may brainstorm and discuss possible solutions with the other person.

Or, depending on the situation, you or someone else may make the decision. Or it may be done be a vote.

There may be situations where you must take a stand and set boundaries. If someone is clearly in the wrong (for example: constantly late or has other negative behavior) and does not own to it, you may have to take other actions (such as firing them).

If it’s abusive or toxic

If someone is abusive or toxic or has some other negative behavior that is affecting you and others, then you may need to completely get out of those situations and separate yourself from them or (depending on what type of behavior) set a firm boundary that if that behavior continues, “X” will happen (such as, you will not talk to them anymore until it changes).


Dealing with conflict can be tough at times, but it is something you can do and do well.

The alternative of not dealing with it is worse: the behavior continues, the relationship is hurt, work productivity decreases, and so on.

In this article we covered the importance of a shared pool of meaning, working on yourself first, the path to action, and the importance of making it safe.

We then went through the STATE method – Share your facts, Tell your story, Ask for others’ path, Talk tentatively, and Encourage testing.

We also covered how to deal with differing viewpoints and come to a solution.

I hope this article helps you speak up and resolve the conflict in your life.

You can get a copy of Crucial Conversations here.

Let me know your thoughts! What steps are you going to take next? Do you have any related tips, suggestions, or examples?

(For more information about resolving conflict, visit our Ultimate Guide to Conflict Resolution).

2 thoughts on “How to Use Crucial Conversation’s STATE Method to Resolve Conflict”

    1. mm
      Thomas R. Harris

      Absolutely. You have to deal with yourself first before you can deal with anyone else. Thanks for the comment!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top